^(pdf link later with youtube of demo)
Well, good morning.
It's 7:23 a.m.
Star Log entry for 20180120 (Saturday, Taiwan Real.One.Christ,
family already at work).
Rene Helmerichs, future copy right holder of A Course In
Miracles, acim.org to know Mind.
Dreams last night, a few recalled. One of note: Mum drove me to the shower. We need need regular showers. So, in this room, were a handful of
others. One I worked with, Daniel,
though symbolic of what feels like another.
All thought they were Jesus. We were
awaiting our turn for the shower (a normal water one in the dream, but symbolically
that feels like "baby shower" type stuff). I looked around, and looked up, and remarked,
"What a joke." Someone spoke
up and said something, referencing not understanding what I'd meant. I replied, "Spirit." Just then my sight went to a window in the
room, and through it, to see and island, and a bomb drop atop it. 'That can't be good, I thought.' In my head I figured traffic from wherever I
was would be backed up because of the want for an exodus from perceived
harm. So I figured, 'the shower can
wait. I'm leaving.' Then I awoke.
A while later my wife, Lindsay, awoke to share, 'wow,
strange dream last night.' She shared,
'I dreamt of Natalie Yewchyn, but not the way she looks now; she was still
young and pretty (--like age 29 when this story began on 22 Aug 2011, before
the arrest at her lies on 3 Sept 2012.).
You were still upset with her, in the dream (this one I'm not). You were playing the guitar and singing to
her.
Yesterday, when I arrived at work after a day off graciously
bestowed without them needing to give me overtime hours, I was asked what my
plans for today are... whether I could do a demo at a new branch tomorrow
(today). I didn't say no. I only asked what was needed, and worked it
out mentally until I felt comfortable with it.
Now, my tolerances for ambiguity are rather higher than, well, pretty
much anyone if http://talk2dream.com is
taken into account. So things sort of
work themselves out to where I left the day with an exact list of what to do
tomorrow, developed with the three managers of the place.
Oh, that reminds me of numbers. I'd wanted to clarify the phrase "one
the first day...". One establishes
two. One cannot exist without an origin,
and in an ever-changing environment, a common existence is the unknown value of
"nothing", symbolized by a zero, to whatever active ingredient we
call "one". So two exists with
one. But one and two make three, in the
ever-changing place. And that can only
ever be an incomplete view. It follows
that three follows one and two and actually means 12, but only really and not
physically. Fours are the number of
testing. They require trust in the logic
of "One establishes two" such that other twos are able to oundersta
nd by piecing together on their own. In
that way is 1 both 2 and 3, because it is the trinity, apart from naught,
0. Fives, Edgar Cayce said, "were
ever the number of change" noting that a body with 5 limbs, 5 digits on
each of its limbs, and 5 holes in its head, was deemed Adam ("the
ideal") for the environment on this planet about 200,000 years ago when we
materialized in form here after annihilating Mars in a global war that ripped
the atmosphere there to bits. I guess
that unconscious war-mongering mental pocket of goo currently maintains Canada 's legal
structure... because that's the country that notably is most refusing our
global digitized IoT concept for true and honest sustainability (i.e. acknowledging
the founding logic to reveal a sustainable aware sentience actually supporting
the whole of whatever possibly we can call life in any environment deemed to be
"forever changing"_
So back to the demo...
I'm a bit nervous.
Should be Ok though. I mean, I've
been through worse right? Like,
yesterday, when two of the managers were going at each other over trust in me
(there's been some wavering as messages typed and sent, never needing to be
re-read by me again, are received, read without prejudice, digested, and then
realized to mean "we are either together, or not. And, if not, I can't say I have your
back" (but in tell you that I don't, or can't, I recognize that I'm
pinching my own subconscious believe-barrier-making-the-limit-of-my-believing-with-personal-choice,
and so I know we'll pretty much always be together so long as I've been gifted
the chance to drive our boat.)
Here's the thing: I can't give a demo at another branch, legally
in Taiwan, UNLESS I'm married, and that's technically illegal for the school
then, to pay me for a demo that I'm going to tell everyone right now I'm doing
for free. In this way can I be assured
that whatever happens at the Demo, remains my own personal responsibility, and
so I can pretty much say and do what I like, and post a video about it later to
youtube.
Of course we have trust.
And we know "anything you say and do will and can and likely
already has been, if not used, then certainly figured into God's great mind for
everything--no matter what you might think of the situation so make sure you've
settled your own moral arguments first by asking others how and why we can't
simply work together in a cleaner partnership."
The school I work for as problems. Every place does. The ability to fix problems resides only in
its "together" concept. In this
case, the school for which I work has an exceedingly great concept FOR
together, and so no matter what happens, I'll always be able to steer focus
from whatever occurred into whatever else we'd like to occur, because that's
the whole idea of "together".
If you think this is a ramble, or useless, ask yourself,
"What exactly have you contributed to OUR life on planet earth? Can you take down a country government with
your logic? Wanna share mine?" (SHARE IT, dumbass--Natalie said she laughed
when she heard me call her that in an email of Jan. 2012 from the Georgian
College server, to which they prevented my legal access while telling
psychiatrists she wasn't lying about never having wanted to be with me until
the end of days on earth.)
You kids.
youtube link later. Channel
talk2dream
Comments
Post a Comment
A show word verification should have come up after the comment is published?