TO: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres
Re: Taiwan
and sustainable development for One China
updated 30 Aug 2018 (contents: true, though incredible)
Mr. Secretary-General,
The work of the United Nations is excellent. Unfortunately, this letter does directly
demonstrate the UN to be condoning ongoing actions against its
very own publicly stated initiatives. It
is therefore written not only to the UN, but to every peace activist, every
human rights collation, every university student desiring true beneficial
change, and to all Muslims, Christians, and atheists alike.
The people of Taiwan wish to complain to you, Mr.
Secretary-General, representing The United Nations (UN), that you are
permitting stacking of the deck (cheating).
It is directly related to your 17 Global Goals for rich and poor nations
alike. An explanation is followed with
examples.
We are aware that thinking exists on a spectrum. We are unaware the spectrum is literal. Any spectrum has but two ends, two extremes
(two Masters), yet both must ultimately serve the same order originating any
concept for order.
It is folly to assume two related events occur by
accident. Every extremist is a highly
refined state of order, be it correctly guided or askew in judgement. This is the same as saying neither master is
inept.
Your website is correct to assert the 17 Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), also called global goals, are inter-connected. Because they are inter-connected, you must
logically understand the source of interference for all goals is one same
point: there exists a global lack of legal definition for that originating
thought, "mind".
Ideas of the origin of each of our thinking are expressing
itself around the world as wars for "God", "Allah",
"wars to end terror", the Papisy (since the
mother of Jesus could not have been a virgin if, to quote Jesus,
students are to be able to become like their teachers, which necessitates a normal birth--rather, according to the Cayce material, she freely gave her body to many men knowing she would produce the living incarnate of our collective unconscious so she did not know who was the father of her child and that was deceptively turned into a virginal-birth story centuries later), arguments about money
(the idea of lack), and, simply also UN measures preventing Taiwan citizens
from entering UN meetings, or ROC reporters from covering them, and other
disabilities senselessly imposed upon Taiwan.
You are wise to have chosen the mainland in this argument,
given its financial support (actually UN-sanctioned financial raping, but for
which the UN had no choice being already succumb to US authority) to the US "too big
to fail" bank bailouts of the last decade.
The people of China were needed to support the
struggling global economy. Isn't it
normal for the poorest nations to bear the greatest burdens of climate change,
quoting Pope Francis in An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth To Power?
It is interesting to note that you would choose to exclude Taiwan , to
choose instead the mainland, in the same year (1971) that the gold standard was
absolved. The result has been to permit
the private company U.S. Federal Reserve to sell its paper as new global gold
to make a super-power functional above the breaking backs of poorer
nations. It is foolish to assume the
events are not connected, as it is also foolish to overlook the fact of bombs
in the basement of The World Trade towers were needed to ensure evidence of
pre-circular (verified) mega-scale money transfers was fully destroyed. But that you then also permitted The U.S.A.
to back out of the Paris Climate Treaty (originally signed 22 April 2016)
despite your Global Goals--that's the part of ongoing stacking referenced at
the start.
You are aware that a country which openly spites your
publicized global goals does directly declare war upon your intentions, yes?
For Taiwan to want to push you for membership is no better
than you to say, "We esteem to become part of the UN tolerance toward
growing global injustices openly served the masses of The United States Of
America by its very own leadership, Mr. Trump-et al."
The result of the mental argument about "mind" is
truly unfortunate, and sits at the root of all your current SDGs problems. The poorest Canadians, for example, are
arrested for crimes they oftentimes did not commit only to be presumed guilty
and used as unofficial human trail phase II candidates in mental wards after
the presumption of guilt and sheer lack of consideration for a criminal trial.
It's a hair-raising petition. An individual was tortured (by your own
definition) in Canada on presumption of criminal guilt without receiving a
criminal trial, and despite trying to warn officials that the entire endeavor
was to write a book "demonstrating mind for science", to market a charity to build a global school. It is precisely the poorest who are least likely
to be heard in any global argument, or any esteemed colleague such as yourself,
Mr. Secretary-General.
The Executive Yuan for Taiwan has little choice
in the matter of the petition. Taiwan legal
officials (prosecutors) have already charged its writer for insulting one Clare
Chiang, vice president of a Sesame
Street school partnership overseeing 2500
students. All statements to Ms. Chiang
were, of course, true and legally permitted under international "freedom
of speech" laws, but who really respects freedom of speech nowadays anyway
if the UN itself cannot vote for the people of the U.S.A. to cork the false keystone
trumpet?
We, the people not supporting your tolerance of The
U.S.A.-Canada psychiatric pact, support the decision for Taiwan NOT to push you
for membership because Taiwan
is, simply, doing more for your Global Goals than you are.
For information about the current and ongoing projection on
Taiwan soil, see an update for the above mentioned petition against Canada
titled "Shocking Real News: Sesame Street, Taiwan, China" wherein The
Executive Yuan for Taiwan permits a school system of 2500 students to defraud
parents while not interceding a wrongful charge of slander against one who
advocates against the injustices at https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23114450
Or, perhaps consider the perspective more inline with cited UN
considerations, "Taiwan LAF (Legal Aid Foundation) mocks China law". In this example, The Executive Yuan for Taiwan
actively permits the LAF (its national "help the poor with legal
struggles" organization) to insist that one of its lawyers, Ms. Elsa Yang,
must continue to represent an individual despite her desire, and insistence,
not at all to communicate with the defendant nor submit his desired defence to
prosecutors. A full glimpse of the
situation is in the update at https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23165052
Remember, while mainland China is permitted to destroy
churches in the name of "no religion is good enough global "One China
communism", ref "Christian woman BURIED ALIVE while trying to stop
the demolition of church in China" https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mP6hX2Ptrcazv5ySpupoiTPA3lQvskSK/
, the mainland does make a better partner for the UN's unspoken vendettas than
pro-church and possibly real-world true peace (if the petition is respected)
Taiwan.
Rene Helmerichs
rhelmerichs@gmail.com
Appendum:
Students for global change, The Climate Realty Project, see the documentary movie JFK (1991) recounting meticulous facts recounting the United States government awareness and support of the 1963 John F. Kennedy, 35th President, assassination. For a larger-scope understanding of events related to, and directly supporting U.S. government dissensions, refer to the 3 hour documentary "Money Masters" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2i6uftJhB8
There is more at foot than any one person can conceive.
Appendum:
Students for global change, The Climate Realty Project, see the documentary movie JFK (1991) recounting meticulous facts recounting the United States government awareness and support of the 1963 John F. Kennedy, 35th President, assassination. For a larger-scope understanding of events related to, and directly supporting U.S. government dissensions, refer to the 3 hour documentary "Money Masters" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2i6uftJhB8
There is more at foot than any one person can conceive.
Comments
Post a Comment
A show word verification should have come up after the comment is published?