Mind Explained

^

A Course In Miracles is a book written by a team of doctors who were curious about mind, and our innate thinking processes.  The book is entirely logical.

The Law Of One is the principle of oneness.  It says simply this:

On a subatomic level, all things in the world are always changing.  Therein must we recognize that a constant state exists to sustain any perceived motion of every part of any thing.  It means directly that all futures exist as a present state, and that the end is simultaneously both certain and joyous for all.  There is no final judgement.  Rather, there is an ongoing judgement carried within our minds to which we cling that defines any one future as more preferable to another.  The choice for personal experience, which future is to be experienced as a later-present relative reality, is available to anyone and everyone all the time, and throughout every dimension of time.

Think of mind like a cone that ends in a point.  The point is a living being on earth.  Birds, dogs, dinosaurs, and people are all the same that way.  Actually, technically, the point ends at any thing, but let's narrow it to what we perceive to be consciously acting beings.  The difference is the size and scope of the cone.  In the end, at the top of the cone, all minds are linked and shared as just one harmonious mind.  That mind existed before the dawn of time, and is simultaneously aware of everything in time for all time to come.

Remember, the top of the cone is timeless.  Each point ends in an experienced moment.  We carry the moments to create a temporal story.  We achieve greater awareness of the whole, literally, with acceptance and forgiveness of each other.  However, we do exist within a perceived temporal reality, even after physical death (more like fluid time, but still inside the confines of time).  Mind is a continuous thinking machine.  Timeless is the only state that exists constantly to support, or sustain, the every changing dynamic landscapes experienced at any changing moment.  Heaven, the real one, is the state of full awareness of self at any point in time, and the awesome potential of that self as being always with all other perceived selves.

If we see someone intentionally hurt another, we have a choice.  We can do something to stop it, or we can deny that it is part of our common reality.  Denial doesn't help us accomplish control over the affairs in our own life.  Actually, denial directly allows someone, like the protagonist of a colossal story, to portray actions of denial as antagonistic to a becoming new world order that becomes evident in the craziest most serious story this world will have ever seen.

Minds link.  Thinking continues at night.  It is wholey possible to tap into the minds of others and negotiate reactions in a state that is not knowable to either.  Actually, glimpses of such agreements are seen in dreams and visions, however, the symbolic nature is often not understood and the dream or vision passed off as an "omen" or nonsense.  All dreaming and visions occur in the minds of the dreamers.  The dreamer never loses authority over his or her dream.  A dreamer in a state of self-denial does relinquish authority for the larger part of the dream.  Authority is then reverted back unto a perceived other who is "more forgiving" simply because the authority is always shared with the shared-state one eternal mind sustaining the whole show.  That is also effectively how "hypnotism" works, except, in this case, the suggestion is not at all hidden and rather appears like a command because its logic is infallible.

The craziest-serious story demonstrating mind for science, see https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23434601

It's found in dual tongue with 2012 voice placed into video with transcript to verify original intent of writing a story for science (specifically engineered to "unite the egos of churches", however there being ultimately only one supra-conscious ego, to engender true worldwide peace with harm to none in a way all politicians must be able to accept) at https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23584198

It's all logical.  It is founded on the first principle of miracles stated by NYC University of Columbia School Of Medicine profs in the 1960s: "there is no order of difficulty in miracles.  One is not harder or easier than another."

We literally have the ability to "read" each other's mind, except the "reading" part is more of a "thought suggestion imparting" part.  We through out ideas, and play at our very own feedback.  We each exist in a separate state of mental confusion, and collectively that is expressed as different bodies on the same planet all wanting different things.  Eventually we learn the trick of needing only to center and support each other, to be able to understand just how and that we share but one same mind.

After that, the legal structure of the world itself must yield to the mind of the one that carries the flaming torch for law.  We are each its star, and ignite the divine within each other, as the word "Namaste" implies.

"Amen", do remember, means "and the means" for a prayer to also be accomplished.  The reminder is directly to the praying person somehow thinking that he's lost his mind.  A person who prayers for others without directly evidencing to the other how and what action is being done to mitigate the underlying problem, is an idiot purely because the universal mind is already aware of all, save for the ignorance of idiots who've been refusing to partake in the joy of its majestic benevolent fountain.

God only keeps the parts moving, forever.  We get to choose what to use them for.  The only rule is for same-applied-consistency: anything not inconsistent with anything else is defaulted eternal reality.

Beyond that, it all gets rather stupid and immaterial, but nonetheless real.

We argue about the word "God", yet God is a personal concept for us all.  The common part of it all is the "not".  We are ALL "not God".  Therein are we both "God" (with that part that keeps all the parts moving), and "not" (the part that thinks eternity is somehow always moving and not also amplifying just its same-state).

It's all logical to me anyway.  Maybe start with Gary Renard's Disappearance Of The Universe.

Rene

15 Nov 2018