^ "How many things in this world do you expect to be always changin? "Note I said how and not what. Allow me to draw a circle in which to write your answer: O. "Note that the circle is not very big, so I'm not expecting a big answer. One person said one, then another person said two, and the first person said two also. There were four of us sitting in the huddle. "So, is at 1, or is it 2?" I continued. "Because he knows it's one." I gestured to the individual who changed his mind. I offered, "Would you like to explain?" No one answered. The the dialogue continued in only thought, a more direct form of communication since we'd achieved the state. The second person was going to say two for "me" and "you", because we are separate. The first person understood that the concept of separate (and even "not" for "zero" or "any") is a singular concept. I am you, you are me...
Since when has Canada exchanged reason for madness?