Dear Clay,
This is written specifically to Clay Mathematics
Institute. It is lengthy, but entirely
pertinent to the problems you have posted, and our future (individually and
collectively). There is contained a
request that you report this to the highest authorities for information
recounted in the linked 14-page summary focused yet in Taiwan but with a
distinct global extension that cannot be missed by even the most obstinate
enforcers.
We are reminded that a proof is always personal, and
personally easier to understand in the way that terms of a mathematical
(fundamentally logical) problem are grouped.
I am writing a doctoral work to demonstrate (not just tell
but show) that God exists with all equally.
An atheist may contest that God does not exist, however, each personal
alive that is able to read, is equally able to think, and therefore innately
attests to living in a commonly shared reality governed by an unrecognized
constant state, order. That state establishes
our ability to measure time as ordered, without ever fully recognizing the
order underscoring every temporal delineation (relative reality; universes of
physical space).
Three solutions to seven of the millennium problems that you
have posted are offered within the work.
Your condition for the "proofs" to be accepted is to publish
them in a peer-reviewed journal, or similar, that has existed for at least 2
years. Thereafter, you may consider the
proof as valid and declare your problem solved.
However, that does not negate the possibility that my three solutions
are accurate while no one has published them in a publication of your
liking. Accordingly, I am inclined to
demonstrate the validity of the proofs to you in an easier way, and one which
you will find you have little choice accept, but will inherently oppose and
wish to ignore.
I cannot apologize enough to you for the negative thoughts
that you may have and I assure you that none are intended nor intentionally
bestowed from me.
The simple proof is this: consistency must same-apply to
reveal an ever-becoming state of greater consistency, in any relative
reality. Therefore, a state of constancy
exists but exists unrecognized. It
follows that eternity exists. In
eternity, all minds are joined to such a refined degree that it really becomes
just one thinking mind able to simultaneously function within the separate
beliefs of every individual believing mind to be something personal and not
shared. It follows that our One Mind
would be able to prove anything to anyone personally, in a way understandable
by everyone.
This will require use of the law. We are raised in cultures that respect
law. Even ISIS
respects law. The law ISIS
respects is simply more belief-oriented than internationally accepted common
law. The point is still the same
underlying law established by the same singular order establishing the ability
of seemingly separate objects to function coherently in every universe of time
and space.
This email follows my filing of a charge against the vice
president of a collection of 12 branches of a private school (mid-size; 300
employees) commonly called Sesame Street Kidsland in Tainan City of The
Republic Of China (Taiwan ). The document I had prepared to file included
multiple infractions but was deemed to difficult to understand. The original 31 May 2018 document as filed
with the charge of fraud is at:
The officer at the Tianan District Prosecutor's Office read
the summary and shortened it somewhat.
Here is a copy of the joint submission given to the plain-clothed
officer at The Tainan District Prosecutor's Office. He did not leave his name, nor gave me a file
number. He also stated that it was
against the law for me to receive a copy of the document that I signed, which I
may formally question in international court of the charge is not respected:
Who are you charging?
I charge the vice president of
Kidsland [name] for fraud. I was hired
by Kidsland from 1 Aug 2017 to 31 July 2019.
I told and provided my criminal record to the vice president on 20 May
2017. She deleted my national
requirement to give my criminal record check from Canada from her contract to
me. Then they hired me without the
criminal record paper. On 20 Jan. 2018,
students' parents learned my past. They started
to believe that I was mentally ill. On
22 Jan 2018, I was told not to go to work.
On 4 May 2018, the vice president told The Tainan City Government Labor
Department that she fired me because I would not provide my criminal
record. So, a Legal Aide Foundation
lawyer said Kidsland needs to keep paying my salary. I want to fix my criminal records in Canada . I did nothing wrong. Kidsland heard the story. Kidsland believed the story. That is why they hired me. We had the agreement to support each
other. Instead of honoring the agreement
they are promoting defame to my reputation.
That is everything.
Rene Helmerichs
[signed on a green paper printed
copy at The Republic Of China Tainan City's District Prosecutor Office 31 May
2018]
The charge is the first to follow the 30 May 2018 email from
Kidsland wherein they requested me to attempt to argue with them in court:
The police officer noted that I would need the names of
individuals to charge. This is a
one-page email sent to my previous employer yesterday, 31 May 2018, asking for
names. They have not yet replied:
Three "proofs" to seven of your presented
mellenium problems are found, currently on pages 60-65 of the dissertation at:
The dissertation is a work in progress. More important is the argument existing now
within the public court system of Taiwan . I am seeking to end a worldwide religious
argument about God. In fact, I am
looking to end all religious arguments once and for all. If that isn't the millennium problem of all
time, then I bid you to offer another.
You are far more reputable than I, at the moment. I am requesting that you forward this email
to the relevant authority. I am not
looking to waste time in court. I offer
understanding about God at the blog post:
I am copying it here, because it does very much elucidate
that inferred back at the top, that we are innately able to reason with an
infinite mind. An infinite mind is able
to re-group terms of logically sound problems in an indefinite number of ways
until more and more people catch onto the fact that the infinite mind
exists. Unfortunately, people may infer
the writer of text promoting an infinite mind is something other than merely
another voice for it. Ergo, fair warning
is needed to The United States government, and all other governments, that can
conceivably be taken to international court for any number of human rights
cases resulting from the facts summarized in the 14-page document filed with
police in Taiwan
on 31 May 2018, linked above and re-linked here:
The implication of sharing all this is that Rene Helmerichs
IS NOT considered a terrorist but a voice for that sustaining every drive for a
sustainable, wholesome, compassionate, and kind future together.
Understanding
By Rene Helmerichs, 1 June 2018
Matthew, at the start of chapter 7 in the Renewed King
Version of the bible, writes:
"Understand judging. When you judge, you can be judged. If you judge someone for a small crime, God
can show you more crimes. You will see a
point when you judge. You will see many
points when God judges you. Do not fear
those points. God does not want to hurt
you. God is a teacher. God continuously forgives you. God is with you. God is with you now, in your head! God hears your thoughts. God and The Evil One know your desires. You can only understand yourself when you are
willing to forgive. When you do not
forgive, The Evil One accepts your thoughtful offerings. Thoughts drive actions. Actions come from a collection of forgotten
thoughts. There is only memory, and not
memory; re-membered internet spam, and imperfection; forgiveness, and
blame. Evil collects the energy of your
offerings. When the evil account is
full, evil returns your offers with interest.
In every action there is only the choice to serve God or Evil. Jesus taught that HE was The Evil One. Jesus understood that actions follow thoughts
with much less delay the more we hone our own habits to be
always-forgiving. He allowed the
government to kill him. Then he came
back to show everyone that the body is not who we really are. Jesus showed the wholey spirit. The wholey spirit is our highest idea for our
true reality. Jesus showed everyone that
he accepts all blame for everything.
That way, Jesus is forever with God and not with evil. Jesus teaches that everyone shares the same
eternal God AND the same unreality because our minds are eternally united. That is why God will always win in the
end. That is also why an old name for
God is 'Eloheeem' which shows a singular plural concept. That is also why time always has order but
seems like chaos most of the time. In
court there are only two sides. But God
is equally for both sides because God under-stands every scale the same
way. Therefore, God does not belong in a
courtroom. That is why we (any people
who argue) should really talk about our misunderstandings. Every person has only two choices: we can
work together and not go to court, or; an honourable court helps us to work
together. A dishonourable person blames
and seeks punishment. An honourable
person will always risk going to court to correct dishonourable government
officers. The purpose is always to teach
that we share the same one wholey mind for the same one God called
'All-ah'. And now, we will forever find
each other in the same one spirit for the same one Christ. 'Amen' means 'and the means shall
follow.' Amen, means and the
means."
Thank you.
In kindness to same likeness,
Rene
Rene Helmerichs (dob 2 March 1977); written 1 June 2018 for
The Foundation For Inner Peace's A Course In Miracles (www.acim.org
re: Manual question 12), and;
the petition to Canada at http://talk2dream.com
for 700 million dollars funding to build the international school destined to
certify global teachers of the book A Course In Miracles.
Report, report, report: real worldwide peace is possible if
we work together for it.
Comments
Post a Comment
A show word verification should have come up after the comment is published?