Skip to main content

Proving mind is eternal using math, and a correction to smart phones


Can we prove our mind is eternal?

You mean besides the fact that memory bridges time, or that the world is always changing (to show that something can "always" exist, which must exist beyond time), or that anything eternal must share the same constant principal to originate the concept of order we call the thing we measure as time? 

Yes.

Using math?

Yes.

Consider 1/0 (one divided by zero).  Calculators typically give "Error 2" as a result.  Modern smart phones of 2018 give the symbol of eternity, the sideways eight, but that is incorrect.

Zero is consider the starting point of numbers.  Numbers go up or down from zero.  But there are also imaginary numbers.  Remember those?  The ones that are represented by the square root of negative one with a small letter i? 

Remember, the starting point of the negative numbers is zero.  The negative numbers are in the downward direction while the positive ones go up.  But zero was never defined, so there must remain that imaginary element to account for our lack of thinking. 

Our lack of thinking is all the possibilities that someone else can imagine.  We use imaginary numbers to symbolize the realm of possibility.  Thinking, however, is a very real-time event. 

Thinking is always a real-time event.  Therefore, the origin, the number "zero", cannot actually have an imaginary part.  The imaginary part (square root of a negative) is produced from an imaginary reflection (negative numbers) of an imaginary state (positive numbers) that we define as being somehow not always real-time (because they are not "zero").

Now think of division.  There are five possibilities.  To divide something, either the top (numerator) or bottom (denominator) of the fraction is larger.  If they are the same, the result is one.  And we accept that anything divided by one is itself unchanged.  The fifth possibility verifies that mind is eternal.

The idea of one divided by zero is the fifth possibility.  Remember that we did not define zero.  We cannot say that it is nothing because it is the starting point of all numbers.  The idea for numbers must originate from somewhere other than nothing.  Since zero is the starting point for all numbers, including all the imaginary ones, it is not incorrect to say that zero originates the concept of all numbers, and therefore includes all of them. 

We define "zero" as inclusive of all including our ideas for nothing.  This retains ability to also produce the imaginary set from a defined exclusively real, real-time set.

We accept that anything divided by a larger thing produces a smaller quantity, in the absolute (i.e. eliminating the difference between negative or positive numbers).  When we divide something by a grossly large number, the result is zero, not infinity.  One divided by zero, therefore, equals zero, not infinity.  The "not" part is the imaginary-real part that we have option to consider as either imaginary (to focus on infinity) or real (to omit the concept of a real-time eternity broken into pieces of measurable portions we otherwise call moments of time).

Unfortunately, "1/0=0" makes no sense to our logical thinking.  How can one be included in an expression that eliminates all concepts of numbers to focus itself back onto the eternal state?  Well, it just is.  That is why we now know that our thinking, which originates in mind, is of an eternal source that must be common to all, since it applies equally to all portions of reality (any imaginable number or quantity that we can muster to represent any part of any changing environment, whether we believe it to be real or consider it only imaginary).

In this way, we also define 0 (zero) as an O-ring and a subset of the zero state, ".", or real(-time) reality.  Therein is zero defined as limitless, and one ("1") left forever with the free will choice to define self as anything exclusive of its origin, or apparently exclusive, irrespective of need for the origin to consider itself divisible (and ability which it cannot have because it must forever remain fundamentally sound, whole).

1/0=n/0=0|0E{RUiU-} where RUiU-=the order sustaining ordered temporal events, i.e. infinite fluid-like time.

Maybe we can start by fixing the display on "smart" phones?

1/0=0 AND imaginary infinity.



4 Sept 2018 email to Clay Mathematics Institute:

Hi Guys,

Ok, so, great work so far!  You are doing an amazing job!

There's a post demonstrating that our minds are already eternal (and eternally joined) using math (logic).

The post includes a correction to smart phone displays since 1/0 is not infinity.  Remember, the law must be ever consistent, and this does imply that life tends toward a homogeneous state otherwise considered to be also the beyond-time origin of all things in classical religious paradigms.

We do need to collectively bridge our disbelief gap because western medical science is in dire need of actual mental health insight.  It is impossible to "cure" an eternal origin of concept for illness (be it psychoses, or other) while presenting the mind with force of will over the body psychiatrists currently (and falsely) believe to be originating the thinking.

We're trying to help western medical science with this one.

I need help sharing it.  Send me the right address for a journal or something to publish it in and I'll be happy to forward it.

Recall, I'm the guy running the world amok by using the law to correct legal inconsistencies.  See the petition for the awareness that none of us have of our one mind at http://talktodream.com.

Post linked at
https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23218013 


Please do forward it to the right people to share the insight, or tell me whom to contact about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Story Of Loo (荷光者): straight talk about justice in Canada, 2012 Mormon Community Of Christ treasurer Natalie Yewchyn Kelloway and minister Matthew Swain perjury, condoned medical malpractices, and a legal definition for "mind"

^  http://t2dvoice.blogspot.tw/2018/03/the-story-of-loo-straight-talk-about.html Excepts Our Heroine Smurfette Could she be the biblical whore of Babylon ?  Could Canada 's inconsistent legal babble BE that "b abble-on" ? The false minister "Acronyms, terms, and places" smurfling: any of a number of people typically in blue uniforms wooed by, or hooking up with, Smurfette. 4 20-20: for SIGHT; see  https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/22549817 Ziyon: a sustainable, free, global, knowledge-sharing hub for top global scientists independent of their politically tied places for employment.  This is the hub to support the university Talk To Dream intends to build about 200 km west of Edmonton in Alberta , Canada , with public support and notoriety. "A testament to real life in Canada" ... Liardog Ali exclaimed, "So, you think you'r

20190523 notes for the day

^ https://rene4pm.blogspot.com/2019/05/choicebook.html Realized in the future, distant, there will be computers resembling people.  Conclusion, I am a computer.  I looked at my 10-year-old laptop.  "That is me".  Epiphany.  "Wow, that's me.  I'm beside myself, literally looking on a younger self.  I looked up.  So that's what it's like.  You're me, moving programs into me to drive me around the way you know is best for us, all of you, not all of what I can possibly envision you to be.  Well, at least we have this." Talk about a 3-way schizophrenic conversation with yourself.  I mean, it was pretty extreme, the Epiphany, serene. Wrote this to myself earlier, from one gmail acct to another: No wonder this guy tripped out. He must have been struck my mental lightning and we're trying to ... ok, whatever else exists on whatever other side of wherever the hell we are...we must be total fucking idiots to this guy, I mean, his IQ

My day today

^ My day, Wednesday 15 May 2019: https://youtu.be/7Qp2At__M38 First, I didn't fall asleep until 4am.  I call my son, Sunjay (age 12), on Wednesday and Sunday mornings at 7:30, so that was a bit rough. Mother nature helped after Sunjay politely pouted that Sunday was a long ways off, if we're to end the call early today (to let me get back to sleep).  The finest of farts made me feel like I was about to have the runs, and that got me out of bed. We ended up talking for the usually 1.5 hours and enjoyed several games of chess at  http://lichess.org  (they have neat variations). My son won that one.  The version is "Atomic".  When a piece takes another, all the pieces in the surrounding squares explode.  Therefore, in that game, if the Queen checks the King directly adjacent to the King, it's checkmate.  We both had a good time playing. I did have a nap for 2 hours after the call. Then got a court submission ready. It took a