Skip to main content

Proving mind is eternal using math, and a correction to smart phones


Can we prove our mind is eternal?

You mean besides the fact that memory bridges time, or that the world is always changing (to show that something can "always" exist, which must exist beyond time), or that anything eternal must share the same constant principal to originate the concept of order we call the thing we measure as time? 

Yes.

Using math?

Yes.

Consider 1/0 (one divided by zero).  Calculators typically give "Error 2" as a result.  Modern smart phones of 2018 give the symbol of eternity, the sideways eight, but that is incorrect.

Zero is consider the starting point of numbers.  Numbers go up or down from zero.  But there are also imaginary numbers.  Remember those?  The ones that are represented by the square root of negative one with a small letter i? 

Remember, the starting point of the negative numbers is zero.  The negative numbers are in the downward direction while the positive ones go up.  But zero was never defined, so there must remain that imaginary element to account for our lack of thinking. 

Our lack of thinking is all the possibilities that someone else can imagine.  We use imaginary numbers to symbolize the realm of possibility.  Thinking, however, is a very real-time event. 

Thinking is always a real-time event.  Therefore, the origin, the number "zero", cannot actually have an imaginary part.  The imaginary part (square root of a negative) is produced from an imaginary reflection (negative numbers) of an imaginary state (positive numbers) that we define as being somehow not always real-time (because they are not "zero").

Now think of division.  There are five possibilities.  To divide something, either the top (numerator) or bottom (denominator) of the fraction is larger.  If they are the same, the result is one.  And we accept that anything divided by one is itself unchanged.  The fifth possibility verifies that mind is eternal.

The idea of one divided by zero is the fifth possibility.  Remember that we did not define zero.  We cannot say that it is nothing because it is the starting point of all numbers.  The idea for numbers must originate from somewhere other than nothing.  Since zero is the starting point for all numbers, including all the imaginary ones, it is not incorrect to say that zero originates the concept of all numbers, and therefore includes all of them. 

We define "zero" as inclusive of all including our ideas for nothing.  This retains ability to also produce the imaginary set from a defined exclusively real, real-time set.

We accept that anything divided by a larger thing produces a smaller quantity, in the absolute (i.e. eliminating the difference between negative or positive numbers).  When we divide something by a grossly large number, the result is zero, not infinity.  One divided by zero, therefore, equals zero, not infinity.  The "not" part is the imaginary-real part that we have option to consider as either imaginary (to focus on infinity) or real (to omit the concept of a real-time eternity broken into pieces of measurable portions we otherwise call moments of time).

Unfortunately, "1/0=0" makes no sense to our logical thinking.  How can one be included in an expression that eliminates all concepts of numbers to focus itself back onto the eternal state?  Well, it just is.  That is why we now know that our thinking, which originates in mind, is of an eternal source that must be common to all, since it applies equally to all portions of reality (any imaginable number or quantity that we can muster to represent any part of any changing environment, whether we believe it to be real or consider it only imaginary).

In this way, we also define 0 (zero) as an O-ring and a subset of the zero state, ".", or real(-time) reality.  Therein is zero defined as limitless, and one ("1") left forever with the free will choice to define self as anything exclusive of its origin, or apparently exclusive, irrespective of need for the origin to consider itself divisible (and ability which it cannot have because it must forever remain fundamentally sound, whole).

1/0=n/0=0|0E{RUiU-} where RUiU-=the order sustaining ordered temporal events, i.e. infinite fluid-like time.

Maybe we can start by fixing the display on "smart" phones?

1/0=0 AND imaginary infinity.



4 Sept 2018 email to Clay Mathematics Institute:

Hi Guys,

Ok, so, great work so far!  You are doing an amazing job!

There's a post demonstrating that our minds are already eternal (and eternally joined) using math (logic).

The post includes a correction to smart phone displays since 1/0 is not infinity.  Remember, the law must be ever consistent, and this does imply that life tends toward a homogeneous state otherwise considered to be also the beyond-time origin of all things in classical religious paradigms.

We do need to collectively bridge our disbelief gap because western medical science is in dire need of actual mental health insight.  It is impossible to "cure" an eternal origin of concept for illness (be it psychoses, or other) while presenting the mind with force of will over the body psychiatrists currently (and falsely) believe to be originating the thinking.

We're trying to help western medical science with this one.

I need help sharing it.  Send me the right address for a journal or something to publish it in and I'll be happy to forward it.

Recall, I'm the guy running the world amok by using the law to correct legal inconsistencies.  See the petition for the awareness that none of us have of our one mind at http://talktodream.com.

Post linked at
https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23218013 


Please do forward it to the right people to share the insight, or tell me whom to contact about it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Story Of Loo (荷光者): straight talk about justice in Canada, 2012 Mormon Community Of Christ treasurer Natalie Yewchyn Kelloway and minister Matthew Swain perjury, condoned medical malpractices, and a legal definition for "mind"

^  http://t2dvoice.blogspot.tw/2018/03/the-story-of-loo-straight-talk-about.html Excepts Our Heroine Smurfette Could she be the biblical whore of Babylon ?  Could Canada 's inconsistent legal babble BE that "b abble-on" ? The false minister "Acronyms, terms, and places" smurfling: any of a number of people typically in blue uniforms wooed by, or hooking up with, Smurfette. 4 20-20: for SIGHT; see  https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/22549817 Ziyon: a sustainable, free, global, knowledge-sharing hub for top global scientists independent of their politically tied places for employment.  This is the hub to support the university Talk To Dream intends to build about 200 km west of Edmonton in Alberta , Canada , with public support and notoriety. "A testament to real life in Canada" ... Liardog Ali exclaimed, "So, you think you'r...

20190426 mind

^ Working on a submission to the law society of Ontario this weekend This came up last night. See links. More abstract first recording not included.  Key note of recording: "Dream symbology 'your desire' is represented as silverware.  Silver being duly symbolic of money, but silverware as desire specifically as a legal scaling device.  The weight equating a setting on a dial, basically pointing to tangents left or right of the desire.  Balanced scales, of law, in symbolic weights, retain focus on the original goal.  Focus=desire=possibility=actuality to bridge our relative eternally deluded states back unto the indefinable pure existence which all must logically share. Regardless, post with links follows.  See FACEBOOK for pic of first recipient, and active links: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2230959970566465&id=100009574517733 Here is what I learned in a dream last night: Life is about learning focus.  We can only achieve a g...

#talk2dream_To: Google about Android

#Goo.1 Your android is nice.  Is there a way to make the key board flippable apart from the phone and supra to any post-install cmds?  Be just nice. #Goo.2 Problem with blogger app... can't see text when typing in the vertical edit-draft mode. #Goo.3 Partner? #Goo.4 Just endless complaints (I.e. suggestions for obvious fixes) to come, failing partnership. #Goo.5 the mouse-keypad is nice... for swipe function... but not best by your design.  Technical flaws including omitting the creation of the 'crtl v' talk2dream.com_common prompt because all ACIM Graduates understand if users understood how marketing ideas worked, they would remember that need was for the quick access to ctrl_x/copy-and-paste.  So, if we were like, REAL partners, we'd have that intrinsic willingness to cross-support the sort of Sustainability stuff Nestle in Switzerland does at #HENRi.  There's an Android complaint in there. #Goo.10 hey Google, ok, this might become MCD (one rec th...