The Holy Spirit thesis and explanation

Q:

Does the holy spirit exist as one spirit common to all with sentience for all-and-each-individually, or not?

Everything we do leads to something else, but the more things we do for the same thing make it bigger in our memory.  Common sense dictates that every wish can come true, provided none excludes any other.

Common sense also dictates that memory is the ability to bridge two moments of time, at the same time, for collapse of the two into a new moment that is to be either better or worse depending of our understanding of our highest concept for self.  If we understand we are all one, we must promote only global sustainability at every turn.

To end the false psychiatric belief that our physical brains originate our thinking (to end the false idea that our mind is not already eternal; to end the idea that thinking can mental health originates in a colorful pill with yet undiscovered precise chemical composition), sign the petition "An Act Of Kindness" at https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada

  

The Holy Spirit thesis (and explanation):

The Holy Spirit cannot present itself in any form that we recognize or it would present itself with doubt because we would be able to say that it is of our ego (i.e. that we made it).  We exist with differences and cannot therefore make an eternally homogeneous state for all except in the complete destruction of all things we perceive as real, which would be entirely counterproductive to life.  We would be doomed in hell if left with the ambiguity of sorting eternal confusion without a common point of reference.

In order to offer us the free will choice of what we might consider to be ourselves (our ego; self-concept), that sustaining temporal order, the common spirit, is the one thing for which we must always be able to say "It is not of our making."  That sustaining order is the "same-applies-to-all" singular eternal aspect that forever ensures the order sustaining every temporal event to exist within one same universe of universes. 

Heaven and hell are not different states.  The both exist in real-time for all eternity.  We have choice only to argue forever about the indefinable concept of "not".  In our arguing do we each delay to see in the other the lost longing for the same awareness of the same one common tie that binds all motion of any part (subatomic) of any other.  Forgiveness and the willingness to help solve problems is the way.

Any truly common spirit cannot be made or invented by any of our ideas for it.  Same-applies-to-all means that there exists only one actually eternal spirit.  It follows that we do use it, despite our arguments for it, and use its logic to attempt to justify the most horrible extremes of divided mental realities, specifically, the horror of hearing negative "voices".

We do not recognize that we know that we are of a collective part of a common mind, our Ego, shared with all, bound in the eternal confusion of a timeless moment.  We are sentient, timelessly whole, not from our Ego, and eternally confused about eternity represented in a timely linear fashion.

What is it like?

It is like walking into a field of air bubbles where each bubble wraps itself around our heads to distort perception and fill Mind with ideas that are not true.  Only by combining two bubbles, the arguments thereof, can the sum or product be met as one larger bubble and truer reality again perceived.

It is the function of our innate logic and reasoning ability, ability for common reason, to discern reality in every changing environment.  To argue, if you will, for just ourselves as just the same Self.

Arguments present themselves as a dot, a moment in time, but are in fact a line at (toward-from) a common goal.  The goal is always to learn to better relate.  Such is the design of life on earth, born into family structures that demand forgiveness (without considering the demand for forgiveness to be anything but absolutely necessary).

Vision is the ability to "see" the outcome of an argument.  Genius (plural genii) recognizes the same outcome of any argument as the greatest goal for all mankind and can plot a course accordingly from any point to any goal.  The means are a unique course beneficial to both and ultimately exclusive of none, being for the highest (farthest reaching, most encompassing) common goal.

Each dot along the line of time must be a different representation of the same eternal argument.  Only in this way are same-and-different able to co-exist.

Each point could also be considered a "ghost", or a spirit, a wish or a whim, a culture, a country, and/or certainly a legal structure of some sort because it must contain the same reason, being of the same one origin for the same one certainty (ultimate goal).

In this concept for reality, the body is a means to its own end.  The end is not of rotting flesh because it does not change.  It is the origin of life (as we perceive it), and every idea underscoring any idea for change.

The body is itself a point in time, the arguments for which are but a dot on a larger line (zooming out).

The body is a communication vehicle with unimagined, unthought, ability of perception.  It is symbolic in multiple ways to be able to include every cultural idea for communicating with the spirits that are also nothing more than momentary arguments in a larger concept of time, temporary dots scattered across an eternally ordered field.

Chakra centers, acupuncture, physical therapy, massages, out of body experiences, heart palpations, common senses, chipped finger nails, stubbed toes, a runny nose, a broken foot, stabbing pains in the back left or right, a headache, a stomach ache, feeling queasy, feeling nauseous--is it the environment on the level of form, or the environment as a symbol of something more?  What is the same-state eternal authority like?

The greatest point and the solution to everything: we are arguing over power because we do not understand our mind.  Our mind is shared.  It is impossible that our mind is not shared, and it will never not be shared.  Ergo, we have no actual choice but to work together for the same one local environment.  (Our "free will" is actually only for delay in that regard.)

Thoughts, as we know them, are fleeting.  That is to say, we do not know them or recognize our awareness of their truly common identity.

What is truly important must return to mind, and so our desires cause our awareness to appear to circle, and our speech, or written words, to those awaking, sound equally circular, holographic.  We speak and write and think but to ourselves.

There are patients in mental wards that are plagued with negative "voices", negative thoughts, negative thinking (feedback) that they disassociate from themselves to give something unknown their authority for reason, not recognizing the concave lens into which they stare seeing only contorted reflections of themselves, their own thinking, their own desires.

The problem is the idea of not.  We think we think.  We cannot know that we do not think.  We know we exist because we recognize that we think ("I think, therefore, I am.").  Yet we exist in a reality where we perceive the concept of not to be possible.  In the ultimate sense, the concept of not is a reflection of something that is.  And so, the patients plagued with negative thoughts should actually be taught that they see (hear; perceive) a negative reality because that reality is internal, the opposite direction, from the external reality which the world teaches to be real.

It is perhaps easier to understand the mistaken idea of "not" as a mess of knots.  While one may say the tangle is impossible, other can say, "Impossible only means that it takes more time.  Are you willing to help me start the work of fixing it?"

Mental patients plagued with negative "voices" are merely awakening (become aware--in the most painful and frightening way) to their own denial of spiritual sight because internal is inside-and-out-simultaneously to negate the concept of not in the true sense.

(I wonder how many people are going to understand this.)

Spiritual sight is actually nothing more than being able to speak about the same thing with an unlimited number of real-life parables, and examples, stories if you will, from which all of us children here can learn by example and demonstrate to ourselves that we are able to share authority for our common environment.

This is symbolic:

"And the angels in heaven made war."

"One angel gave him what he asked."

"Another angel gives him what he needs."

What were they arguing about?

Both angels, one for God and one for Government are needed.  A child represents all the people in the world.

A child is born.  His hunger makes him cry.  His mother gives him milk.  His father squeezes his hand gently, each time he feeds.  In time, without words, the child learns.  He learns to open and close his hand to show his mother that he is hungry.

The child is now 5.  He wakes in his bed.  "Last night I met God," he says.  "God came and took me through the wall into a ship.  We played with a stick.  It floated at me.  It hurt to touch.  I learned to move the stick without touching it.  God told me I did well.  God was talking to me in my head.  Then God brought me back to my room."

The mother remarks, "What a strange dream.  What did God look like?"

The boy drew a picture of an alien with one normal ear, and one very large ear.  "Of course God doesn't look funny, but I have to draw one ear big because God hears everything."

What is the correct spelling for the idea behind the right of free will, the freedom of speech, the ability to listen in on every communication ever made with any electronic device... should the symbol for the concept of "wholey" be capitalized or retain the intention that "Holy" somehow applies equally to all in a way that does not include concept for holes?

The angels in heaven continue to argue in the confusion of sharing but one same eternal mind.

Rene

8 Sept 2018

Addition given surprising 100 views in a matter of days:

For further conceptual reading, try the post "Proving mind is eternal using math" at http://t2dvoice.blogspot.com/2018/09/proving-mind-is-eternal-using-math-and.html

This is non-conceptual, i.e., living: because thinking bridges time, none (as the collective singular "all") of our minds cannot originate from any time-defined (temporary) state; we can believe constancy of law does not exist, but any environment that is always changing ensures us of the single fact that a constant state (consistency same-applied) does indeed exist.  Part of this greater dissertation is a play for worldwide peace, for which understanding of any-as-every constant state is necessary.  For living mechanics, see "The Forgiving Piper: Act II, act to heal Taiwan" at https://www.change.org/p/her-excellence-ms-tsai-please-help-us-correct-injustices-occurring-in-canada/u/23236743 

What happens, happens for a reason.  The reason is always this: it has brought each of us to exactly this point in our life where we each have The Choice, yet again, for how better to work together for the common goal that all do share, and forgive the other in the process of our own not understanding that we truly are forever going to be of just one ultimate mind.